Charity and Favoritism in the Field: Are Female Economists Nicer (To Each Other)?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Charity and Favoritism in the Field: Are Female Economists Nicer (To Each Other)? Using a very large sample of matched author-referee pairs, we examine how the gender of referees and authors affects the former’s recommendations. Relying on changing matches of authors and referees, we find no evidence of gender differences among referees in charitableness toward authors; nor do we find any effect of the interaction between the referees’ and authors’ gender. With substantial research showing gender differences in fairness, the results suggest that an ethos of objectivity can overcome tendencies toward same-group favoritism/opposite-group discrimination. JEL Classification: J71
منابع مشابه
Charity and favoritism in the field : Are female
Charity and Favoritism in the Field: Are Female Economists Nicer (To Each Other)? Using a very large sample of matched author-referee pairs, we examine how the gender of referees and authors affects the former’s recommendations. Relying on changing matches of authors and referees, we find no evidence of gender differences among referees in charitableness toward authors; nor do we find any effec...
متن کاملWhen Ingroups Aren’t “In”: Perceived Political Belief Similarity Moderates Religious Ingroup Favoritism
Motivated thinking leads people to perceive similarity between the self and ingroups, but under some conditions, people may recognize that personal beliefs are misaligned with the beliefs of ingroups. In two focal experiments and two replications, we find evidence that perceived belief similarity moderates ingroup favoritism. As part of a charity donation task, participants donated money to a c...
متن کاملPatient Favoritism as a Barrier to Justice in Health Care: A Qualitative Study
Background and Objectives: Justice is one of the basic principles of medical ethics which indicates rightful, fair, impartial, and equitable care. The present study aimed to introduce patient favoritism, a phenomenon that undermines justice. Methods: The present qualitative study was conducted based on some data derived from another qualitative study titled “Investigating the process of achiev...
متن کاملOffice Politics in Tournaments: Strategic Use of Favoritism to Fight Collusion∗
Economists have by large ignored the phenomena of office politics, such as collusion and favoritism, which prevail in organizations where, due to the subjectivity of performance assessments, the incentive mechanism often takes a form of tournament. This paper studies these phenomena in a stylized tournament model. It finds that favoritism cannot benefit organizations when employees are unable t...
متن کاملAlmizan Commentary on the Verses of Infaq with a Stimulating Approach
One of the most important socio-economic teachings of the Qur'an is the emphasis on charity and helping the deprived as the practical pillars of faith and the important effects on the well-being of the individual and society. The Quran verses in the field are abundant and may be examined in many ways. As viewed by psychologists, motivation is needed for any action. The present study examines th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010